Articles

Typology of border regions based on the principle of comlimitism

Received: 15.07.2024 Published: 15.07.2024

EDN: JYUADC DOI: 10.22394/2070-8378-2024-26-4-67-75

Full text

Abstract

The unique geographic location of Russian civilization combined with exceptional natural and climatic factors along with interregional variations in nationality, religion, and culture results in a significant degree of heterogeneity within Russia’s regional border space; however, we can find similarities in economic development in some border regions. In such circumstances, it is especially pertinent to develop a typology of border regions that considers the details of the mutual influence between the state border and the border region, as well as the impact of regional development on the state border. However, there is also mutual determination regarding the economic development of the border regions between the two neighboring countries.The article defines the concept of comlimitism as the foundation for the typology of border regions to describe such interregional interactions for the border regions of two neighboring states. Using the comlimitism principle, the author classifies border regions into five categories based on the type and strength of their economic ties.The conclusion drawn is that the entire range of border interregional (interstate at the level of border cooperation) ties and the various ways they interact must be considered when forming the federal center’s targeted regional policy.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Епифанова Н.С. Типология приграничных регионов на основе принципа комлимитизма // Государственная служба. 2024. Т. 26, № 4. С. 67–75. https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2024-26-4-67-75

For citation:

Epifanova N.S. Typology of border regions based on the principle of comlimitism // Gosudarstvennaya Sluzhba. 2024. Vol. 26, no. 4. P. 67–75. https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2024-26-4-67-75

Share

How to Cite

Epifanova N.S. Typology of border regions based on the principle of comlimitism // Gosudarstvennaya Sluzhba. 2024. Vol. 26, no. 4. P. 67–75. https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2024-26-4-67-75

Коды статьи

  • EDN JYUADC
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)

References

  1. Арсентьева И.И. Понятие "приграничье" в современном научном дискурсе. Вестник Забайкальского государственного университета. 2012. № 6 (85). С. 24-29. EDN: PEDDYZ
  2. Артоболевский С.С., Вардомский Л.Б. Приграничные ареалы и региональная политика в Российской Федерации // Проблемы общественной географии. Киев, 2010. С. 14-26. EDN: VPAMNN
  3. Божко Л.Л. Концептуальные подходы к определению приграничных территорий. Региональная экономика: теория и практика. 2010. № 4 (139). С. 47-54
  4. Гранберг А.Г. Основы региональной экономики. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2001
  5. Грибова С.Н. Приграничное сотрудничество: теоретические и правовые истоки изучения. Известия ИГЭА. 2006. № 1 (46). С. 15-20. EDN: IQKWFL
  6. Корнеевец В.С. Классификация приграничных регионов России. Региональные исследования. 2010. № 4 (30). С. 48-53
  7. Осмоловская Л.Г. Функции границы как фактор развития приграничных регионов. Вестник Балтийского федерального университета им. И. Канта. Серия: "Естественные и медицинские науки". 2016. № 1. С. 45-54.
  8. Christaller W. Central Places in Southern Germany / Transl. by Baskin C.W. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1966. In English
  9. Filho J., Horridge J. Economic integration, poverty and regional inequality in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Economia. 2006. Vol. 60. No.4. P. 363-387. In English
  10. Fischer R.D., Serra P. Income Inequality and Choice of Free Trade in a Model of Intraindustry Trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1996. Vol. 111. No. 1. P. 41-64. In English
  11. Friedmann J. Regional development policy. Cambridge, 1968. In English
  12. Martniez O.J. Border people. Life and society in the U.S. Mexico borderlands, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1994. In English
  13. Thompson H. Free trade and income redistribution in some developing and newly industrialized countries. Open Economies Review. 1995. Vol. 6. P. 265-280. In English