The article analyzes the issues related to implementing and protecting the rights to land plots in public ownership, as well as individuals and legal entities who own buildings and structures placed on these plots. The procedure for acquiring publicly owned land plots by owners of buildings and structures placed on them, stipulated by Art. 36 of the Land Code of the Russian Federation, was the basis for a new norm that significantly expanded the legal mechanisms and foundations for repurchasing land plots through privatization. However, in Russian judicial and arbitration practice, there is still a considerable number of cases involving disputes related to the protection of the rights to land plots of individuals and legal entities. In addition, considering the functional purpose of the territory, many complex issues arise regarding the size of the claimed area of the plot on which the structure is built. The legal problem associated with preserving the lease of a land plot in the case of destruction of an object placed on it, as well as the right to conclude a new lease agreement without tenders, also requires an immediate legislative resolution. The procedure for actions in the case of destruction of real estate, when the lease agreement for a land plot concluded by the owner of the destroyed building contains conditions that exclude the right to sign a new contract, has not been defined.
Petrushkin Vitaliy
Federal Arbitration Court of the Volga District
Publications of the author
In the journalp. 21-24
The functions of legal modeling (a theoretical and legal review and analysis)
V. Petrushkin
Published: 15 July 20141 Views0 Downloads
Defining the essence of the model is performed by means of a legal analysis of the forms of their manifestations (A.S. Bezrukov, Krasavchikov O.A.), the definition of the concept of «modeling» (A.V. Panin, V.K. Babaev, etc.), the allocation of simulation tasks (E.P. Sitkovsky etc.). The theoretical analysis and classification of functions legal models - interpretive, explanatory, predictive, criterial, programmable, transformative, epistemological (B.A. Glinski, B.S. Grjaznov, B.S. Dynin, E.P. Nikitin, V.D. Rudashevsky, A.F. Cherdantsev, V.M. Baranov) - allowed a functional separation of a «legal model» and «a legal paradigm» (V.V. Shakhanov, Huntington, A.S. Bezrukov) in order to determine the theoretical and methodological field data concepts.
