Ponkin Igor

The article dwells upon the matters of manual control in the system of government instruments: its place, role, means and limits of its engagement in public administration. The author gives definition of «manual control in public administration» and draws the conclusion, that relegation of manual control technologies in public administration to solely negative manifestations is unfounded. Moreover, a reasonably balanced mix of regular institutional governance and case-by-case manual control management is a prerequisite for public administration as it is one of the rulers of the state management tools. Besides, the author describes peculiar properties of manual control as emergency management and precision control. The article is based on the methods of system analysis, synthesis, and induction. The application of these methods has allowed to define the distinctive characteristics of manual control in public administration, and to circumscribe the use of this management technique.

This article is devoted to the complex research of the role and importance of an expert in public administration system. What determines the modern growth of the demand for experts for the public interest and for the public administration purposes? What is an expert? How do we identify an expert and what criteria should be used for this? The article is based on the use of studying methods of the systemic analysis, synthesis, induction. By using these methods the distinctive characteristics of the expert notion were discovered. Also, the determinants of the limitation of the possibilities for the development of the universal and comprehensive definition of this concept were discovered and presented.

Theoretical understanding and study of the concepts and contents of the resiliency of the system of the public administration including the resiliency to the pressure of the heteronomy of the foreign or international public policy are considered in the article. A number of negative factors, resiliency to which is quite essential for the public administration system, is identified by the author. The concept and significance of the resiliency of the system of the public administration to failures (defects) and errors of the public administration are also studied in the article. With the help of methods of the synthesis, systemic and comparative-legal analysis distinctive characteristics and significance of the resiliency of the system of the public administration to the negative factors were discovered.

The complex research of the concept, place and value of legal regulation as a tool for public (state and municipal) administration is described in the article. Legal regulation in the public administration system is considered in two aspects as a legalnormative basis of the process and of the entire public administration system and as an integral tool (toolbar) of public administration. The tools for working with arrays of regulatory material are described. The definition of “the regulatory mechanism of the public administration” concept is proposed by the author.