The article considers strategic planning practices in Russia since the transition to market economy. The authors assess the outcomes of federal strategies and the possible causes of their incomplete implementation. The study reviews the development of legislation on strategic planning and the problems and contradictions associated with the implementation of the laws, including the subfederal level. The course of development of the project format of strategic documents (national projects, etc.) and the reasons that led to the strengthening of its role, despite the lack of legislative registration, are also presented. Based on the results of the review, a characteristic is given of the current state of the strategic planning system, which is assessed as unstable and transitional, and possible directions for its further development are noted.
Dmitriev Mikhail E.
Business Partnership ‘New Economic Growth'
Publications of the author
In the journalp. 11-18
Quality of public administration and cost-effectiveness
D. Maslov, Z. Aivazyan, M. Dmitriev
The modernization of the Russian system of the public administration during the previous stages of the administrative reform was carried out in the framework of a functional approach. The rules of execution of the state functions and the provision of the public services were developed from this perspective. A significant part of the activities of the state bodies, in fact, is of a process nature. However, it is not structured to the level of algorithms, it is poorly described and in practice it can't be implemented in such a format: the regulations do not contain the necessary information and often represent the content of the activity (which they should regulate) in a distorted form. The quality of the activities in such case is difficult to assess and virtually impossible to manage. As part of the reforms of the Russian public administration system, the process has never been considered as an object of management, nor have the attempts been made to optimize it.
