Articles
CORRUPTION AND HUMAN NATURE: AN ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS EXPERIENCE
Received: 15.05.2021 Published: 15.05.2021
DOI: 10.22394/2070-8378-2021-23-3-59-64
Full text
Abstract
The global problem of corruption needs an integrative understanding from psychology, sociology, jurisprudence, and cultural approaches. Corruption threatens national and global security, leads to the degradation of humanistic, moral values, and significantly reduces the level of social capital and the effectiveness of governance in a wide range of areas. The article considers the origins of corruption and its motivating factors based on ideas concerning the nature of man, the human psyche, based on an analysis of the relationship between the conscious and unconscious levels of consciousness and subconscious, instinctive impulses. The author discusses the possibility of preventing corruption in an ecosystem approach to civil service, which would allow a holistic presentation of internal and external factors that determine the essence of the civil service, the prerequisites, and conditions for its harmonization with the social environment. By understanding civil servants’ behavior, internal motives, and external incentives, it is possible to define a public service ecosystem that will ensure a symbiosis between the civil service, society, and the State. The creation of such an ecosystem can contribute to the qualitative improvement of public administration
Keywords
How to cite
Для цитирования:
МАМЕДОВ Н.М.О., ШИШОВА Ж.А. Коррупция и природа человека: опыт экосистемного анализа // Государственная служба. 2021. Т. 23, № 3. С. 59–64. https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2021-23-3-59-64
For citation:
MAMEDOV N.M.O., SHISHOVA Z.A. CORRUPTION AND HUMAN NATURE: AN ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS EXPERIENCE // Gosudarstvennaya Sluzhba. 2021. Vol. 23, no. 3. P. 59–64. https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2021-23-3-59-64
Share
How to Cite
MAMEDOV N.M.O., SHISHOVA Z.A. CORRUPTION AND HUMAN NATURE: AN ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS EXPERIENCE // Gosudarstvennaya Sluzhba. 2021. Vol. 23, no. 3. P. 59–64. https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2021-23-3-59-64
